Platform review · The OKR Software Benchmark

Weekly planning and OKR software
Weekdone combines weekly planning with OKR tracking. Priced from free, with paid plans from $9 per user/month. It ranks #16 of 20 overall, #7 of 13 for affordable, and #13 of 13 for ease of use. Tested hands-on on September 11, 2026.
Choose Weekdone if
You're a team of three or fewer learning OKR basics on the free tier, or you want admin control over who can create OKRs in a simple tool.Skip Weekdone if
You want teams to set their own confidence on check-ins, per-key-result trend charts, AI, or data connectors — the table stakes of the modern field.Our score weights OKR-specific capability — third-party scores like G2's cover the whole product. How we rate
| Price from | Free |
| Full-featured tier | $10.8 /user/mo |
| Minimum annual spend | $108 |
| Free tier | Yes |
| Trial | 14 days |
| Documented connections (six assessed) | 5/6 |
| Native AI features | No |
| MCP server | Not verified |
| Public API | Yes |
| Overall rank | #16 of 20 |
| Hands-on test | September 11, 2026 |
| G2 rating / Gartner rating | 4.1 (38) |
| Alternative | Pick it instead if | Trade-off | From |
|---|---|---|---|
| TabilityModern check-in experience | You want owner-set confidence, per-key-result trends, and AI working inside the product. | No free tier — trial only | $6 |
| TeamflectFree tier, more modern | You want a generous free tier (10 users) in a more current product, and you live in Microsoft Teams. | Built Teams-first — weaker outside Microsoft 365 | Free |
| MooncampSimple, but current | You want the same lightweight spirit with a modern interface and cleaner views. | No free tier and annual billing only | $8.1 |
Overall scores share published weights. Recorded evaluations are exploratory; see the protocol. Read the full Weekdone alternatives guide.
AI capabilities were reviewed separately from the unchanged platform-level ratings. Read the AI-category scores, sources, restrictions and gaps. Unknown capabilities are labeled Not verified.
Weekdone has documented connections for Slack, Jira, Microsoft Teams, Asana and Google Sheets among the six connections this benchmark assesses in depth.
Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.
| Category | What it measures | Position |
|---|---|---|
| Best affordable OKR software | price point, no hidden costs, core features | #7 of 13 |
| Best OKR software for startups | pricing, ease of use, okr features | #9 of 13 |
| Best OKR software for enterprise | enterprise features, security compliance, okr reporting | #13 of 13 |
| Best OKR software for mid-market | ease of use, scalability, okr reporting | #13 of 13 |
| Easiest OKR software to use | interface design, user experience, reporting capabilities | #13 of 13 |
| Best OKR software overall | features, reporting, ease of use | #16 of 20 |
Positions are computed from each category's published criteria weights — including the ones Weekdone loses.
Evaluated by Sten Pittet, Co-founder and CEO, Tability. Evaluator employed by a competing vendor, Tability.
One 30-minute exploratory session on the named plan using a shared sales scenario. Tasks varied with access and time. This is not a reliability, security, support-quality, or long-term adoption study. Capabilities not found in the session may exist in other plans or workflows.
Shared fictional sales-pipeline scenario, Q3 2026. The tasks actually attempted and any access limitations are recorded below; the AI prompts were not run identically across products.
Weekdone is the veteran of this benchmark, and it shows. The first thing I noticed after signing up was that the UI looks dated next to everything else I have tested. The bones of a decent product are here – teams in the sidebar, quarterly objectives, KPIs, a presentation mode – but the experience kept reminding me how much the category has moved on.
There is no importer, so I added my objective and key results by hand. The key result parameters dialog is a bit like Profit.co's – result types, currencies, decimals to pick through – but I got my three targets in. The team view then buries them: quarterly objectives, personal OKRs, personal KPIs, and projects all sit as tabs and blocks in one busy page, with a multi-line graph on top that I could not decode. The Overview tab is meant to be the clear one and isn't. Funnily enough, the Tree view is the best screen in the product – a clean look at just the OKRs – and the hierarchy view is decent too.
This is where I would stop most teams. There is no panel for an individual key result and no progress chart, so you cannot see how a number moved over time. Updating a value meant dragging a slider. Comments attach to the key result but not to the value you logged, updates append in chronological order so the newest sits at the bottom, and – the part I mind most – Weekdone picks your status color for you based on progress. You cannot say "we're at 48 but I'm worried". Confidence belongs to the team, not to a formula: you can sit on a good number heading for a crash, or a bad number on a strong trajectory, and this design cannot express either. Tability, Rhythms, and Profit.co all leave that call with the owner – Weekdone alone decides for you.
Credit where due: Weekdone was the first platform in my testing order where I found restrictions on who can create OKRs – a scaling control also observed in Tability; exclusivity was not established. Check-in reminders exist too, set globally in the app settings. But we found no AI surface in this trial, reporting is basic bar charts on ready-made dashboards, and integrations stop at Slack, Teams, and task links – I found no data connectors beyond a new Google Sheets key-result automation advertised in the KR dialog, which I did not test.
Of everything I have tested so far, Weekdone lands at the bottom – a step below OKRs Tool. My field so far: Perdoo on top, then a toss-up between Mooncamp (pick it for simplicity) and Profit.co (pick it for integrations and enterprise breadth, and accept the configuration pain), then OKRs Tool, promising but rushing features out before they are solid, and then Weekdone, which is missing table stakes around check-ins, key result charts, and connectors. The free tier for three users is still a fine way to learn OKR basics – but growing teams should look up the list.
Core OKRs
Manual setup works, but the team view buries your OKRs under four other things.
Check-ins
Weekdone picks your status color for you – and that alone would stop me recommending it for check-ins.
Statuses
The tree view shows the result – colors assigned by formula, not by the team.
Enterprise controls
Restrictions on who can create OKRs – a scaling control that, among tested platforms, only Tability also ships.
AI
No AI surface was found during this trial.
Reporting & integrations
Basic bar charts and two chat integrations – the category has moved past this.
2 other recorded integration names (unreconciled): Basecamp, Google Tasks. These are not verified native connections; omission does not establish absence.
Free tier
$0
Full-featured
$10.8 /user/mo
Free for up to 3 users (all features). Sold as fixed user packages with volume-tiered pricing: $9.86/user/mo annual for 4-6 users, $9/user/mo for 7-15 users, declining to ~$3.10/user/mo at 850 users. Contact sales at 500+. Annual billing saves 20%. 14-day trial for 4+ users, no card.
Side-by-side comparisons against the field, feature by feature.
Scored 0–5 by this benchmark, OKR capabilities only — see how we rate.
Weekdone has a free tier, with paid plans starting at $9 per user/month.
Weekdone is best suited for small, startup teams, based on feature fit and our scoring model.
Top alternatives include Tability, Teamflect, Mooncamp.
Last updated September 11, 2026 · release 2026.Q3.2
Evaluating Weekdone? It has a free tier, so a hands-on trial costs nothing.
The OKR software buyer report
The full market briefing as a PDF — rankings, pricing, AI results, and readiness matrices — plus the complete dataset as a CSV, delivered to your inbox.