Platform review · The OKR Software Benchmark

Weekdone logo

Weekdone

Weekly planning and OKR software

2.5
Overall benchmark score

Verdict

Weekdone combines weekly planning with OKR tracking. Priced from free, with paid plans from $9 per user/month. It ranks #16 of 20 overall, #7 of 13 for affordable, and #13 of 13 for ease of use. Tested hands-on on September 11, 2026.

Choose Weekdone if

You're a team of three or fewer learning OKR basics on the free tier, or you want admin control over who can create OKRs in a simple tool.

Skip Weekdone if

You want teams to set their own confidence on check-ins, per-key-result trend charts, AI, or data connectors — the table stakes of the modern field.

Our score weights OKR-specific capability — third-party scores like G2's cover the whole product. How we rate

At a glance

Price fromFree
Full-featured tier$10.8 /user/mo
Minimum annual spend$108
Free tierYes
Trial14 days
Documented connections (six assessed)5/6
Native AI featuresNo
MCP serverNot verified
Public APIYes
Overall rank#16 of 20
Hands-on testSeptember 11, 2026
G2 rating / Gartner rating4.1 (38)

If Weekdone isn't right

AlternativePick it instead ifTrade-offFrom
TabilityModern check-in experienceYou want owner-set confidence, per-key-result trends, and AI working inside the product.No free tier — trial only$6
TeamflectFree tier, more modernYou want a generous free tier (10 users) in a more current product, and you live in Microsoft Teams.Built Teams-first — weaker outside Microsoft 365Free
MooncampSimple, but currentYou want the same lightweight spirit with a modern interface and cleaner views.No free tier and annual billing only$8.1

Overall scores share published weights. Recorded evaluations are exploratory; see the protocol. Read the full Weekdone alternatives guide.

AI capabilities were reviewed separately from the unchanged platform-level ratings. Read the AI-category scores, sources, restrictions and gaps. Unknown capabilities are labeled Not verified.

Key integrations

Weekdone has documented connections for Slack, Jira, Microsoft Teams, Asana and Google Sheets among the six connections this benchmark assesses in depth.

Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.

Where Weekdone ranks

CategoryWhat it measuresPosition
Best affordable OKR softwareprice point, no hidden costs, core features#7 of 13
Best OKR software for startupspricing, ease of use, okr features#9 of 13
Best OKR software for enterpriseenterprise features, security compliance, okr reporting#13 of 13
Best OKR software for mid-marketease of use, scalability, okr reporting#13 of 13
Easiest OKR software to useinterface design, user experience, reporting capabilities#13 of 13
Best OKR software overallfeatures, reporting, ease of use#16 of 20

Positions are computed from each category's published criteria weights — including the ones Weekdone loses.

Hands-on findings

Tested verified Sep 11, 2026Free trial (no credit card) · 30-minute exploratory evaluation · read the protocol · see how it compared against 11 others in the same test

Evaluated by Sten Pittet, Co-founder and CEO, Tability. Evaluator employed by a competing vendor, Tability.

One 30-minute exploratory session on the named plan using a shared sales scenario. Tasks varied with access and time. This is not a reliability, security, support-quality, or long-term adoption study. Capabilities not found in the session may exist in other plans or workflows.

Shared fictional sales-pipeline scenario, Q3 2026. The tasks actually attempted and any access limitations are recorded below; the AI prompts were not run identically across products.

Weekdone is the veteran of this benchmark, and it shows. The first thing I noticed after signing up was that the UI looks dated next to everything else I have tested. The bones of a decent product are here – teams in the sidebar, quarterly objectives, KPIs, a presentation mode – but the experience kept reminding me how much the category has moved on.

Setup works, the views fight each other

There is no importer, so I added my objective and key results by hand. The key result parameters dialog is a bit like Profit.co's – result types, currencies, decimals to pick through – but I got my three targets in. The team view then buries them: quarterly objectives, personal OKRs, personal KPIs, and projects all sit as tabs and blocks in one busy page, with a multi-line graph on top that I could not decode. The Overview tab is meant to be the clear one and isn't. Funnily enough, the Tree view is the best screen in the product – a clean look at just the OKRs – and the hierarchy view is decent too.

The check-in experience is missing table stakes

This is where I would stop most teams. There is no panel for an individual key result and no progress chart, so you cannot see how a number moved over time. Updating a value meant dragging a slider. Comments attach to the key result but not to the value you logged, updates append in chronological order so the newest sits at the bottom, and – the part I mind most – Weekdone picks your status color for you based on progress. You cannot say "we're at 48 but I'm worried". Confidence belongs to the team, not to a formula: you can sit on a good number heading for a crash, or a bad number on a strong trajectory, and this design cannot express either. Tability, Rhythms, and Profit.co all leave that call with the owner – Weekdone alone decides for you.

One genuine enterprise touch, not much else around it

Credit where due: Weekdone was the first platform in my testing order where I found restrictions on who can create OKRs – a scaling control also observed in Tability; exclusivity was not established. Check-in reminders exist too, set globally in the app settings. But we found no AI surface in this trial, reporting is basic bar charts on ready-made dashboards, and integrations stop at Slack, Teams, and task links – I found no data connectors beyond a new Google Sheets key-result automation advertised in the KR dialog, which I did not test.

Of everything I have tested so far, Weekdone lands at the bottom – a step below OKRs Tool. My field so far: Perdoo on top, then a toss-up between Mooncamp (pick it for simplicity) and Profit.co (pick it for integrations and enterprise breadth, and accept the configuration pain), then OKRs Tool, promising but rushing features out before they are solid, and then Weekdone, which is missing table stakes around check-ins, key result charts, and connectors. The free tier for three users is still a fine way to learn OKR basics – but growing teams should look up the list.

Finding by finding

Core OKRs

Manual setup works, but the team view buries your OKRs under four other things.

  • No importer – the objective and three key results were added by hand, with result types, currencies, and decimals to pick through in a Profit.co-style parameters dialog.
  • Quarterly objectives, personal OKRs, personal KPIs, and projects share one team page as tabs and blocks, making the OKRs hard to distinguish.
  • The Tree view is the clearest screen in the product, and the hierarchy view is decent – the Overview tab is the weakest of the three.
  • KPIs are supported as their own section, which our previous data missed.
The sales team page – OKRs, personal OKRs, KPIs, and projects competing for one screen

Check-ins

Weekdone picks your status color for you – and that alone would stop me recommending it for check-ins.

  • Status is derived from progress, with no way to set your own confidence or mark a good-looking number as at risk.
  • There is no panel and no progress chart for an individual key result, so you cannot see how a value moved over time.
  • Updating a value meant dragging a slider, comments are not attached to the value you logged, and updates append oldest-first.
The check-in – value dragged to 48 on a slider, no per-key-result chart to show the trend

Statuses

The tree view shows the result – colors assigned by formula, not by the team.

  • After our check-in the tree colored the updated key result green and the untouched ones red, with no owner input.
  • A team on a strong trajectory from a low number, or crashing from a high one, cannot express it.
The tree view after check-in – statuses auto-colored from progress

Enterprise controls

Restrictions on who can create OKRs – a scaling control that, among tested platforms, only Tability also ships.

  • OKR-creation restrictions exist in the admin settings – a genuine scaling control most modern rivals lack.
  • Check-in reminders are configured globally in the app settings rather than per goal.
  • People and team pages show how an individual or team is doing.

AI

No AI surface was found during this trial.

  • Nothing AI-related appears in the app or its settings, so the two standard AI prompts had nothing to run against.
  • No MCP connector was found.

Reporting & integrations

Basic bar charts and two chat integrations – the category has moved past this.

  • Reporting is ready-made dashboards of basic bar charts, well behind the tested field.
  • A presentation mode exists and works.
  • Integrations found in the session were Slack, Microsoft Teams, and task links – plus a new automatic-key-results-via-Google-Sheets integration advertised in the KR dialog, which we did not test.
The key result parameters dialog – result types and decimals, with the new Google Sheets automation advertised

Capabilities

OKR capabilities

  • YesOKR Management
  • YesGoal Tracking
  • YesKPIs & Metrics
  • YesRegular Check-ins
  • NoTasks Support
  • YesTeam Collaboration

Reporting

  • NoReports & Analytics
  • NoCustom Views
  • NoTemplates

Integrations

  • YesIntegrations
  • YesSlack Integration
  • YesMicrosoft Teams Integration
  • NoData Connectors
  • YesPublic API

AI capabilities

  • NoGoal-setting AI
  • NoGoal-tracking AI
  • NoIn-product conversational assistant
  • Not verifiedVendor-hosted MCP server

2 other recorded integration names (unreconciled): Basecamp, Google Tasks. These are not verified native connections; omission does not establish absence.

Pricing

Free tier

$0

Full-featured

$10.8 /user/mo

What 25 seats actually costs: $930–$2,700 a year. See every team size

Free for up to 3 users (all features). Sold as fixed user packages with volume-tiered pricing: $9.86/user/mo annual for 4-6 users, $9/user/mo for 7-15 users, declining to ~$3.10/user/mo at 850 users. Contact sales at 500+. Annual billing saves 20%. 14-day trial for 4+ users, no card.

Compare Weekdone head-to-head

Side-by-side comparisons against the field, feature by feature.

Ratings & FAQ

Benchmark editorial ratings

Ease of use
2.5
OKR features
2.5
AI features
0
Task support
3
Integrations
2
Pricing transparency
5
Reporting
2.5

Scored 0–5 by this benchmark, OKR capabilities only — see how we rate.

Third-party ratings

Frequently asked questions

How much does Weekdone cost?

Weekdone has a free tier, with paid plans starting at $9 per user/month.

What teams is Weekdone best for?

Weekdone is best suited for small, startup teams, based on feature fit and our scoring model.

What are the top alternatives to Weekdone?

Top alternatives include Tability, Teamflect, Mooncamp.

Last updated September 11, 2026 · release 2026.Q3.2

Evaluating Weekdone? It has a free tier, so a hands-on trial costs nothing.

The OKR software buyer report

Take the benchmark with you

The full market briefing as a PDF — rankings, pricing, AI results, and readiness matrices — plus the complete dataset as a CSV, delivered to your inbox.