What this benchmark covers
22 tracked platforms (20 active), 12 published hands-on evaluations, 15 scored categories and 6 integration guides. Tracked includes acquired and discontinued products retained for context.
Scores are editorial assessments built from recorded sessions, product documentation and pricing records. A vendor enters a ranking only when every criterion in that category has a score — an omitted vendor is outside the assessed set, which says nothing about its capabilities.
One overall score, separate category scores
The overall benchmark score is a weighted mean of seven platform-level ratings:
- Ease of use ×1
- Features ×2
- Task support ×0.5
- Integrations ×1
- Reporting ×2
- AI features ×0.5
- Pricing transparency ×0.5
Multiply each rating by its weight, add the results, divide by 7.5 — Features and Reporting count double. Every other ranking uses its own separately labeled category score with weights totaling 100%, listed per category below. G2 and Gartner ratings are shown for context and never blended into our scores.
Ranks use unrounded values, display one decimal, and exact ties share a competition position (1, 2, 2, 4) in alphabetical order.
Recorded hands-on sessions
The 12 published sessions are 30-minute exploratory evaluations using a shared sales scenario, with recorded deviations. Sten Pittet, co-founder and CEO of Tability, evaluated each product — Tability took the same test as its competitors. Sessions cover setup, check-ins, reporting, alignment, integrations and AI within the time and plan limits; they do not measure security, support quality or long-term reliability.
Where a session ran an AI task, the review records the outcome — including failures and blocked attempts. Task wording varied between sessions, so the table below records status per task.
| Evaluation | Date | Plan | AI tasks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Atlassian Goals | 2026-09-11 | Included with an Atlassian cloud workspace (Goals platform app) | Summary: standard task Write: not attempted |
| Cascade | 2026-09-11 | Free trial (no credit card) | Summary: alternative task Write: blocked |
| Mooncamp | 2026-09-10 | Free trial (14 days, no credit card) | Summary: blocked Write: blocked |
| Oboard | 2026-09-13 | Free trial (30 days, Jira Cloud edition) | Summary: blocked Write: blocked |
| OKRs Tool | 2026-09-11 | Free plan (no credit card) | Summary: alternative task Write: not attempted |
| Perdoo | 2026-09-10 | Free trial (no credit card) | Summary: blocked Write: blocked |
| Profit.co | 2026-09-10 | Free trial (30 days, no credit card) | Summary: blocked Write: blocked |
| Range | 2026-09-13 | Pro trial (14 days, no credit card) | Summary: blocked Write: blocked |
| Rhythms.ai | 2026-09-11 | Free plan (limited AI credits, no credit card) | Summary: not attempted Write: alternative task |
| Tability | 2026-09-11 | Premium trial (14 days, no credit card) | Summary: alternative task Write: alternative task |
| Teamflect | 2026-09-11 | Free trial (30 days, via Microsoft sign-in) | Summary: standard task Write: not attempted |
| Weekdone | 2026-09-11 | Free trial (no credit card) | Summary: blocked Write: blocked |
The standard AI test protocol
- Summary task: “Summarise this objective for a leadership review without inventing results.” Record the exact request, the output, whether it grounded on the workspace data, and any invented facts.
- Write task: ask the AI to update a specified key result and add a specified comment, then inspect the saved record to verify the change. An assistant saying “done” is not verification.
Each task records one of: standard task, alternative task, not attempted, blocked — with the observation and any deviation. Future sessions fix identical wording across products.
Category weights and coverage
Each category publishes its criteria, weights and assessed set:
Best OKR software overall · 20 scored
Scored: Tability, WorkBoard, Perdoo, Profit.co, Peoplebox, Rhythms.ai, Mooncamp, Oboard, Teamflect, 15Five, Cascade, OKRs Tool, Lattice, JOP, Betterworks, Weekdone, Atlassian Goals, Jira Align, Leapsome, Range.
Full rankingBest OKR software for startups · 13 scored
Scored: Tability, Mooncamp, OKRs Tool, Perdoo, JOP, Oboard, Teamflect, 15Five, Weekdone, Profit.co, Rhythms.ai, Betterworks, WorkBoard.
Outside the assessed set: Atlassian Goals, Cascade, Jira Align, Lattice, Leapsome, Peoplebox, Range.
Full rankingBest OKR software for enterprise · 13 scored
Scored: Tability, WorkBoard, Lattice, Profit.co, Perdoo, 15Five, Rhythms.ai, Betterworks, Mooncamp, Teamflect, Oboard, JOP, Weekdone.
Outside the assessed set: Atlassian Goals, Cascade, Jira Align, Leapsome, OKRs Tool, Peoplebox, Range.
Full rankingBest OKR software for mid-market · 13 scored
Scored: Tability, Perdoo, Profit.co, Mooncamp, OKRs Tool, 15Five, Rhythms.ai, WorkBoard, Betterworks, Teamflect, Oboard, JOP, Weekdone.
Outside the assessed set: Atlassian Goals, Cascade, Jira Align, Lattice, Leapsome, Peoplebox, Range.
Full rankingBest OKR software with HRIS integrations · 9 scored
Scored: Lattice, Leapsome, Peoplebox, 15Five, Betterworks, Profit.co, Teamflect, WorkBoard, Tability.
Outside the assessed set: Atlassian Goals, Cascade, Jira Align, JOP, Mooncamp, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Perdoo, Range, Rhythms.ai, Weekdone.
Full rankingBest OKR software for remote teams · 5 scored
Scored: Tability, Mooncamp, Profit.co, Perdoo, WorkBoard.
Outside the assessed set: 15Five, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Cascade, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Peoplebox, Range, Rhythms.ai, Teamflect, Weekdone.
Full rankingBest OKR software with AI features · 7 scored
Scored: Tability, WorkBoard, Profit.co, Rhythms.ai, Perdoo, OKRs Tool, Atlassian Goals.
Incomplete evidence: 15Five, Betterworks, Cascade, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Oboard, Peoplebox, Range, Teamflect, Weekdone.
Full rankingBest OKR software with Amplitude integration · 1 scored
Scored: Tability.
Only one vendor was assessed in this category.
Outside the assessed set: 15Five, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Cascade, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Peoplebox, Perdoo, Profit.co, Range, Rhythms.ai, Teamflect, Weekdone, WorkBoard.
Full rankingBest OKR software with BigQuery integration · 3 scored
Scored: Tability, Profit.co, Peoplebox.
Outside the assessed set: 15Five, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Cascade, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Perdoo, Range, Rhythms.ai, Teamflect, Weekdone, WorkBoard.
Full rankingBest OKR software with ChartMogul integration · 1 scored
Scored: Tability.
Only one vendor was assessed in this category.
Outside the assessed set: 15Five, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Cascade, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Peoplebox, Perdoo, Profit.co, Range, Rhythms.ai, Teamflect, Weekdone, WorkBoard.
Full rankingBest OKR software with ClickUp integration · 2 scored
Scored: Tability, Cascade.
Outside the assessed set: 15Five, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Peoplebox, Perdoo, Profit.co, Range, Rhythms.ai, Teamflect, Weekdone, WorkBoard.
Full rankingBest OKR software with Salesforce integration · 6 scored
Scored: Profit.co, Tability, Perdoo, WorkBoard, Mooncamp, Rhythms.ai.
Outside the assessed set: 15Five, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Cascade, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Peoplebox, Range, Teamflect, Weekdone.
Full rankingBest OKR software with Tableau integration · 5 scored
Scored: Tability, WorkBoard, Profit.co, Cascade, Perdoo.
Outside the assessed set: 15Five, Atlassian Goals, Betterworks, Jira Align, JOP, Lattice, Leapsome, Mooncamp, Oboard, OKRs Tool, Peoplebox, Range, Rhythms.ai, Teamflect, Weekdone.
Full rankingBest affordable OKR software · 13 scored
Scored: OKRs Tool, Tability, Teamflect, Perdoo, JOP, Oboard, Weekdone, Mooncamp, 15Five, Profit.co, Rhythms.ai, Betterworks, WorkBoard.
Outside the assessed set: Atlassian Goals, Cascade, Jira Align, Lattice, Leapsome, Peoplebox, Range.
Full rankingEasiest OKR software to use · 13 scored
Scored: Tability, Mooncamp, Teamflect, Perdoo, OKRs Tool, 15Five, Profit.co, Oboard, Rhythms.ai, JOP, Betterworks, WorkBoard, Weekdone.
Outside the assessed set: Atlassian Goals, Cascade, Jira Align, Lattice, Leapsome, Peoplebox, Range.
Full rankingIntegration assessments
The six integration guides use explicit workflow requirements instead of numeric scores. All 20 active vendors have an assessment for each integration, every capability is recorded as supported, confirmed unavailable or unverified, and unknown evidence never becomes a No. Sources, review dates, connection methods and plan restrictions accompany each record. Listings show Tability first where it qualifies, then other vendors alphabetically — an editorial display order, stated on each guide.
- Slack: 16 documented connections, 4 unverified, 0 confirmed unavailable.
- Linear: 5 documented connections, 15 unverified, 0 confirmed unavailable.
- Jira: 18 documented connections, 2 unverified, 0 confirmed unavailable.
- Microsoft Teams: 16 documented connections, 4 unverified, 0 confirmed unavailable.
- Asana: 13 documented connections, 7 unverified, 0 confirmed unavailable.
- Google Sheets: 11 documented connections, 9 unverified, 0 confirmed unavailable.
Vendor confirmations on record
Dated confirmations by Sten Pittet as benchmark evaluator, recorded separately from documentation and sessions. Each notes what remains unverified.
2026-09-11 — Users can talk to the Tability OKR agent from Slack to use AI Mode. Slack-specific plan entitlements and prompt limits not verified.
2026-09-11 — Tability supports scheduled metric updates from Google Sheets. The exact refresh interval and current plan entitlement not verified.
2026-09-11 — Tability connects to Linear projects as well as issues. Project-specific refresh behavior and automatic numeric progress not verified.
2026-09-11 — Tability supports keeping Asana task statuses in sync. Refresh timing, writeback and automatic numeric progress not verified.
2026-09-11 — Editorial correction: Mooncamp and Weekdone have no native AI features. This does not establish whether either offers an API or external MCP access.
AI scoring
The AI category scores six dimensions from hands-on evidence, evaluator confirmations and vendor documentation — each criterion records its rationale, source, verification date and evidence type. A documentation-based score describes a documented capability, not observed reliable operation, and unknowns stay unscored instead of becoming zero.
The six criteria and scoring anchors
AI scoring anchors
Editorial capability assessment using vendor documentation, recorded evaluations and explicitly labeled evaluator confirmations. Unknown is null, never zero. A score is bounded by the reviewed scope, not proof that no additional capabilities exist. Half points require an explicit intermediate rationale. External MCP conversation does not qualify as an in-product assistant. No reliability benchmark or standardized AI prompt comparison has been completed.
In-product agents · 20%
- 0:
- Confirmed unavailable in the stated scope
- 1:
- Single user-triggered creation or action
- 2:
- Several bounded actions, user-directed
- 3:
- Multi-step OKR workflows with user control
- 4:
- Recurring or proactive workflows plus delegated work and controls
- 5:
- Comprehensive planning, execution, review and delegation with auditable autonomy controls
AI check-ins & smart actions · 20%
- 0:
- Confirmed unavailable in the stated scope
- 1:
- Text assistance for an update
- 2:
- AI-generated update or summary for a limited context
- 3:
- Contextual summaries, risks or connected-data actions
- 4:
- Multiple update/report workflows with traceable inputs and review
- 5:
- Comprehensive auditable updates, risks, scheduled summaries and controlled actions across the cycle
Conversational assistant · 15%
- 0:
- Confirmed unavailable in the stated scope
- 1:
- Narrow or unreliable goal conversation
- 2:
- Contextual answers for a limited goal workflow
- 3:
- Workspace-grounded goal questions and follow-ups
- 4:
- Broad workspace conversation with record actions
- 5:
- Comprehensive grounded analysis, citations and controlled execution across OKR workflows
MCP & agent interoperability · 15%
- 0:
- Confirmed no supported integration route in the stated scope
- 1:
- Limited API or third-party connector with narrow access
- 2:
- Ordinary API or consumption of external MCP tools
- 3:
- Vendor-hosted MCP with authenticated OKR access and documented supported operations; write scope may be limited
- 4:
- Broad vendor MCP read/write across goals, updates and related work
- 5:
- Comprehensive governed agent operations, granular permissions and auditable read/write lifecycle
AI goal setting · 10%
- 0:
- Confirmed unavailable in the stated scope
- 1:
- Generic wording suggestions
- 2:
- Goal drafts or imports needing substantial correction
- 3:
- Contextual objective and measurable KR creation
- 4:
- Contextual drafts/imports with alignment and editable structure
- 5:
- Comprehensive context-aware planning, quality checks, alignment and validated import fidelity
Core OKR foundation · 20%
- 0:
- Confirmed no OKR workflow in the stated scope
- 1:
- Basic goal records
- 2:
- Goals and measurable progress with limited review workflow
- 3:
- Owners, cycles, check-ins and progress views
- 4:
- Alignment, history, cadence, ownership and reporting
- 5:
- Comprehensive OKR lifecycle with adaptable governance, dependency management and reviews
Pricing provenance
Prices are vendor-listed amounts where public, labeled third-party estimates where sourced elsewhere, or quote-only with observed contract data. Every figure carries a last-verified date referring to that individual check, and everything is re-verified each quarterly release. Confirm plan, billing terms and entitlements with the vendor before purchase.
Ownership and verdicts
Tability operates this benchmark and took the same recorded test. Category outcomes are computed from the published rankings; the assessments below are separate editorial calls.
| Category or assessment | Winner | Tability |
|---|---|---|
| Best OKR software overall Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software for startups Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software for enterprise Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software for mid-market Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software with HRIS integrations Computed category ranking | Lattice | #9 |
| Best OKR software for remote teams Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software with AI features Computed category ranking | Tability / WorkBoard | #1 |
| Best OKR software with Amplitude integration Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software with BigQuery integration Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software with ChartMogul integration Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software with ClickUp integration Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best OKR software with Salesforce integration Computed category ranking | Profit.co | #2 |
| Best OKR software with Tableau integration Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| Best affordable OKR software Computed category ranking | OKRs Tool | #2 |
| Easiest OKR software to use Computed category ranking | Tability | #1 |
| OKRs + performance management Editorial assessment Our editorial position is that merging OKRs and performance management is an anti-pattern: tying goals to compensation encourages sandbagging. Tools like Lattice and Leapsome serve this combination well, but we abstain from ranking a category we advise against. | Abstained | Not ranked |
| Free tier Editorial assessment Editorial recommendation based on the recorded Teamflect free-plan terms for up to 10 users. This is not a category score or a claim of market-wide superiority. Confirm current plan limits with the vendor. Tability offers a trial, not a free tier. | Teamflect | Not ranked |