Best OKR software overall in 2026

The ranking

Tability ranks first among 20 scored active platforms, with a 4.5/5 overall benchmark score, ahead of WorkBoard (4.0/5) and Perdoo (4.0/5).

1. 01

   

   Tability

   Top pick

   4.5/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Tability is a modern goal-tracking platform designed for teams who want to manage OKRs without complexity. It focuses on simplicity, accountability, and actionable insights.

   Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Premium trial (14 days, no credit card)

   “Time for our own medicine. Tability was evaluated in a 30-minute session using the shared scenario, and the first difference showed before any goals existed: plan creation asks about check-in cadence and permissions up front. In several other tested tools those were settings I had to hunt for later – here the plan starts with a weekly reminder rhythm and access rules already decided.”

   • Plan creation front-loads the decisions other tools hide – cadence and permissions first, OKRs from text second.
   • The key result is the primary object – a full page with a graph, and a check-in built around the comment.
   • The dashboards you build by hand elsewhere come out of the box.

   

   

   

   AI in this session: The key-result-scoped AI mode answered a strategy question about the specific key result in view, grounded in its context.

   In this category it scores highest on ease of use and features (5), and lowest on reporting (4).

   Choose it if you want a modern, clean OKR platform with dashboards ready out of the box, AI working across the product, and goals built for the agentic world — MCP, scheduled reports, and agents you can assign to key results. Skip it if you need a free tier, performance management with deep HRIS integration, or a heavyweight enterprise rollout with dedicated services at very large scale.

   $6/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.7 (161) · Gartner rating 4.9 (46)

   Full review →Visit site ↗

2. 02

   

   WorkBoard

   4.0/5

   Overall benchmark score

   WorkBoard is an enterprise-grade OKR platform designed for large organizations. It offers comprehensive planning, execution, and analytics capabilities.

   In this category it scores highest on AI features (5), and lowest on pricing transparency (0).

   Strengths: Comprehensive enterprise features · Strong analytics

   Watch for: Steep learning curve · Expensive solution to deploy

   Est. $30/user/month (est.) · G2 rating 4.3 (342) · Gartner rating 4.2 (89)

   Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

3. 03

   

   Perdoo

   4.0/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Perdoo helps organizations implement OKRs and execute their strategy. It offers a balanced feature set for mid-sized to large companies.

   Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (no credit card)

   “Perdoo gave me the fastest OKR setup of the benchmark so far, and it did it with AI. After a classic onboarding – pick your framework, pick your cadence, a small hiccup with the password email that I won't hold against them – I found a goal importer that takes plain text. I pasted my whole test scenario and it came back parsed: objective, three key results with the right targets, initiative. One go.”

   • The AI goal importer is one of the fastest OKR setups in this benchmark – our whole scenario parsed from plain text in one go.
   • In-app AI stops at the importer – but ChatGPT and Claude connect to your goals through Perdoo's MCP server.
   • The full test structure was live and attached to the sales team within minutes.

   

   

   

   In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (2.5).

   Choose it if you want structured OKRs with an AI importer that created the scenario quickly — plus MCP access to your goals from ChatGPT and Claude. Skip it if you need a workspace-aware in-app assistant, ready-made leadership dashboards, or enterprise controls like IP restrictions and creation permissions.

   $9/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.4 (502)

   Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

4. 04

   

   Profit.co

   3.5/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Profit.co is a comprehensive OKR platform that combines objectives and key results with performance management. It offers a wide range of features for enterprise teams.

   Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (30 days, no credit card)

   “Profit.co is the opposite bet to Mooncamp. Where Mooncamp keeps things minimal, Profit.co ships everything – OKRs, performance management, a separate task module, a huge connector catalog – and you feel that breadth from the first minute. Onboarding was slower than the modern tools: account creation, a wait while sample data generated, then email verification before I could start. The workspace arrived with a full set of sample OKRs already in place.”

   • Every key result is a KPI you must define first – goal creation is slow and form-heavy.
   • Check-ins are the smartest moment in the product – our 48 was flagged At Risk against the plan line automatically.
   • Reporting is deep but reads like an advanced spreadsheet – and presentation mode is a download, not a view.

   

   

   

   In this category it scores highest on integrations (5), and lowest on pricing transparency (1).

   Choose it if you want OKRs, performance management, and tasks in one system, with deep integrations and enterprise controls, and you have the patience to configure it. Skip it if you want a lightweight OKR tool your team can navigate without training, native AI that works out of the box, or transparent pricing.

   Est. $9/user/month (est.) · 30-day trial · G2 rating 4.7 (471) · Gartner rating 4.7 (109)

   Full review →Visit site ↗

5. 05

   

   Peoplebox

   3.3/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Peoplebox is an OKR platform focused on goal alignment, business reviews, and execution. It is positioned for teams that want OKRs tied to operating cadence and leadership visibility.

   In this category it scores highest on reporting (4.25), and lowest on pricing transparency (1).

   Strengths: Purpose-built OKR workflows with strong alignment features · Good leadership reporting and review cadence support

   Watch for: Public pricing details are limited · Enterprise configuration can take time

   $8/user/month · G2 rating 4.5 (365) · Gartner rating 4.4 (8)

   Full review →Visit site ↗

6. 05

   

   Rhythms.ai

   3.3/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Rhythms.ai is an innovative AI-powered platform that helps teams align strategy with execution. It combines OKRs with AI assistance to help teams set better goals, track progress, and drive accountability.

   Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free plan (limited AI credits, no credit card)

   “Rhythms.ai drops you straight into a chat window. Signup took seconds, and the first thing the platform wanted was a conversation – so I pasted my test OKRs and said they were for the sales team. The assistant noticed the team didn't exist, asked if it should create it, then built the objective, the key results, and the initiative, checking in with me before publishing. If you use Claude or ChatGPT a lot, this feels immediately familiar. It is also slower than Perdoo's importer, which just went and created everything.”

   • Setup is a conversation – the assistant created the team, the OKRs, and the initiative from one pasted message.
   • The structure landed correctly and reads well in the alignment tree.
   • Check-ins get the details right – manual status, expected-vs-actual, and per-team cadence.

   

   

   

   AI in this session: The setup conversation was an alternative write task – the assistant created the team, objective, key results, and initiative from our pasted scenario, asking before publishing.

   In this category it scores highest on integrations and reporting (4), and lowest on pricing transparency (1).

   Choose it if you want an AI-native workspace — chat-first setup, auto-updating key results, an MCP server, and a huge connector catalog — and you'll trade some everyday responsiveness for it. Skip it if you want a fast, conventional OKR interface first and AI second, per-person dashboards, or control over who can create content.

   Est. $22/user/month (est.) · Free tier

   Full review →Visit site ↗

7. 07

   

   Mooncamp

   3.3/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Mooncamp is a modern, user-friendly OKR platform designed for fast-growing companies. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use while providing powerful OKR management features.

   Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (14 days, no credit card)

   “Mooncamp gave me one of the smoothest starts in this benchmark. I signed up with an email code, skipped the tour, and landed in a workspace already filled with demo data. My test OKRs – one objective for the sales team, three key results, one initiative – were in within a few minutes.”

   • We found no AI surface or MCP connection during this Mooncamp trial; broader availability remains unverified.
   • The core OKR workflow is the strongest part of the product.
   • Check-ins record the number, a status, and a comment – but the flow is metrics-first.

   

   

   

   In this category it scores highest on ease of use and pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0).

   Choose it if you want clean, manual OKR tracking your team will actually use, and AI isn't part of your goal workflow. Skip it if you need AI assistance, an importer for existing goals, a public API, or leadership-ready reporting.

   $8.1/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.8 (296) · Gartner rating 4 (2)

   Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

8. 08

   

   Oboard

   3.1/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Oboard is an OKR management platform that integrates directly into Jira and Confluence workflows. It helps teams cascade company objectives and tie them to work items for better alignment.

   Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (30 days, Jira Cloud edition)

   “Oboard is the OKR layer for teams that refuse to leave Jira, and we tested it exactly there – inside a Jira workspace. Setup started with some confusion about creating a plan for a team, and the objective and key results went in with one recurring annoyance: units. Start, target, or binary types are fine, but the unit field is limited – a five-character cap meant I couldn't express things the way I wanted, and a 12% conversion metric took some bending. Teams attach to items more like tags than structure.”

   • Objectives and key results work, but units are the recurring annoyance – capped at five characters.
   • The check-in gets the two big things right – manual status with an auto toggle, and comments built for discussion.
   • The default dashboard and per-team performance report do the job for a tool this light.

   

   

   

   In this category it scores highest on task support (4.5), and lowest on AI features (0).

   Choose it if your team lives in Jira, you don't want another platform, and you want simple OKRs with good check-in discussions at a very low per-user price. Skip it if you're scaling OKRs across many teams — automated key results from data sources, team-versus-team views, creation permissions, or AI in the daily workflow.

   $2.16/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.6 (16) · Gartner rating 4.2 (29)

   Full review →Visit site ↗

9. 08

   

   Teamflect

   3.1/5

   Overall benchmark score

   Teamflect is a comprehensive performance management platform built natively for Microsoft Teams. It combines OKRs, performance reviews, 1-on-1s, and feedback in a single integrated solution.

   Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (30 days, via Microsoft sign-in)

   “Teamflect pitches itself as the Microsoft Teams OKR app, and the first discovery of the session is that it's really a web app with a Teams extension – the same architecture as Tability's Teams plugin. Signing in with Microsoft still asked me to authenticate again, importing from Excel bounced me out to the web app, and so did the admin center. Inside Teams, the UI is average: compressed, wide, a lot on screen at once. Not the worst I've tested, not close to the most comfortable.”

   • The OKR model is light – objectives can be their own metric, and the key result form is titled "Objective".
   • Metric types stop at percentage, number, and currency – our hours-based key result lost its unit.
   • Check-ins are easy and – rare in this field – you can hold a real conversation on the key result.

   

   

   

   AI in this session: Ask AI produced a generic summary built on guesses – "it likely focuses on…" with invented suggested outcomes – and then stated it could not find the objective in the current Teamflect goals data. It did not read the metrics, the check-in, or the attached key results.

   In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (2).

   Choose it if you're Microsoft-heavy and want performance management with light OKRs in one package — reviews, meetings, tasks, recognition, and a free tier for 10 users. Skip it if you want OKRs that scale — progress charts, flexible metrics, grounded AI, per-person views, and data connectors beyond the Microsoft suite.

   $7/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.5 (170)

   Full review →Visit site ↗

10. 10

    

    15Five

    3.1/5

    Overall benchmark score

    15Five is a performance management platform that includes OKR functionality. It combines weekly check-ins, reviews, and objectives for holistic people management.

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (2).

    Strengths: Strong performance management features · Weekly check-in system

    Watch for: OKRs are secondary to performance management · Limited OKR-specific features

    $11/user/month · G2 rating 4.6 (1,804) · Gartner rating 4.4 (25)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

11. 10

    

    Cascade

    3.1/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Cascade is a strategy execution platform that combines planning, OKRs, metrics, and initiative tracking in a single workspace. It is designed for organizations that need clear visibility from company strategy down to team-level execution and accountability.

    Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (no credit card)

    “Cascade organizes work into plans and teams – a structure that felt familiar from Tability – and my Sales OKRs plan existed within a minute. Then the OKR model and I started negotiating. Cascade doesn't really have objectives and key results: it has focus areas, objectives, and then a choice between measures, projects, and actions. Getting my three key results in meant creating each one as a measure through a Profit.co-style form – define the metric, the target, the expected progress – which works, but is slow, and the terminology never quite fits OKRs.”

    • Cascade doesn't natively follow the OKR model – key results become "measures" behind a KPI-style form.
    • The update form gives comments real space – but Cascade picks your confidence for you.
    • The AI-generated executive review is the best thing in the product.

    

    

    

    AI in this session: The executive quarterly review generator produced an AI-written overview of the plan that correctly identified the stalled measures, quantified the gap against expected progress, and recommended a conversation with the goal owner.

    In this category it scores highest on integrations and reporting (4), and lowest on pricing transparency (1).

    Choose it if you're a numbers-driven, strategy-execution organization that reports to executives quarterly — the AI-generated QBR and MBR reports are genuinely good. Skip it if your OKR practice runs on team judgment and conversation — owner-set confidence, comment threads on updates, and a weekly check-in rhythm aren't Cascade's model.

    Est. $29/user/month (est.) · Free tier · G2 rating 4.8 (235) · Gartner rating 4.4 (14)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

12. 12

    

    OKRs Tool

    3.0/5

    Overall benchmark score

    OKRs Tool is a flat-fee OKR platform for teams on a budget, and it is showing promise with updates covering KPIs, reports, built-in AI, and documented connections including Jira and a hosted MCP server. It is still a young product with a small team and only a handful of third-party reviews.

    Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free plan (no credit card)

    “OKRs Tool starts strong. Right at onboarding it offered to draft my goals with AI, I pasted my test scenario, and the objective and three key results appeared with sensible targets. Then the cracks showed: every start value had been imported as zero, and when I corrected them, my edits saved but the app kept showing the old numbers. One key result ended up reading 100% ahead of pace because of an inverted baseline.”

    • AI drafting set up our OKRs in minutes – with the wrong baselines.
    • Goal editing fought back – changes saved but didn't show up.
    • Check-ins work, but progress is a bar, not a trend.

    

    

    

    AI in this session: Asked what to focus on this week, the AI Coach answered that our objective had no key results defined – it had three – and built its recommendations on that wrong premise.

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on integrations (2).

    Choose it if you're a small team on a tight budget — the free tier and flat fee are the cheapest way into OKRs, and you can live with rough edges while the product matures. Skip it if you need a fast, polished product, automatic key result updates from your data sources, or AI you can trust to read your goals correctly.

    $49/flat fee · Free tier · G2 rating 4.6 (7)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

13. 13

    

    Lattice

    2.8/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Lattice combines performance management with goal setting and OKR tracking, giving people teams a unified system for alignment and development.

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0).

    Strengths: Unified goals and performance management workflows · Clear OKR and goal tracking for people teams

    Watch for: OKR depth is secondary to performance management · Limited task and project execution workflows

    $8/user/month · G2 rating 4.7 (4,060) · Gartner rating 4.4 (61)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

14. 14

    

    JOP

    2.8/5

    Overall benchmark score

    JOP (Joy of Performing) is simple cloud-based performance management and OKR platform. It helps align business strategy to execution and provides insights into business performance.

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (1).

    Strengths: Combines performance management and OKR tracking · Visual goal mapping (Constellations)

    Watch for: Not focused on OKR management · Limited integrations and reporting capabilities

    Est. $6.5/user/month (est.) · 90-day trial · G2 rating 4.6 (133)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

15. 15

    

    Betterworks

    2.6/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Betterworks is a mature enterprise HR platform focused on performance management and continuous conversations. It's focused on employee engagement but also has OKR functionality.

    In this category it scores highest on features and integrations (3), and lowest on pricing transparency (1).

    Strengths: Performance management capabilities · AI-powered insights for HR

    Watch for: OKRs is secondary to performance management · Higher pricing (min. 500 users)

    $8/user/month · G2 rating 4.4 (217) · Gartner rating 4.5 (12)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

16. 16

    

    Weekdone

    2.5/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Weekdone combines weekly planning with OKR tracking. It's designed for teams that want structured check-ins and progress updates.

    Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Free trial (no credit card)

    “Weekdone is the veteran of this benchmark, and it shows. The first thing I noticed after signing up was that the UI looks dated next to everything else I have tested. The bones of a decent product are here – teams in the sidebar, quarterly objectives, KPIs, a presentation mode – but the experience kept reminding me how much the category has moved on.”

    • Manual setup works, but the team view buries your OKRs under four other things.
    • Weekdone picks your status color for you – and that alone would stop me recommending it for check-ins.
    • The tree view shows the result – colors assigned by formula, not by the team.

    

    

    

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0).

    Choose it if you're a team of three or fewer learning OKR basics on the free tier, or you want admin control over who can create OKRs in a simple tool. Skip it if you want teams to set their own confidence on check-ins, per-key-result trend charts, AI, or data connectors — the table stakes of the modern field.

    $9/user/month · Free tier · G2 rating 4.1 (38)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

17. 17

    

    Atlassian Goals

    2.4/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Atlassian Goals is the goals platform app included with every Atlassian cloud plan. It tracks objectives and success measures across Jira and Confluence, aimed at lightweight goal visibility rather than a full OKR practice.

    Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Included with an Atlassian cloud workspace (Goals platform app)

    “Atlassian Goals is the goals layer that ships free inside every Atlassian cloud plan, and the question going in was simple: does being inside Jira make it a serious OKR tool? The goal directory got me started, a goal maps to the objective, and success measures map to key results. Then came a familiar friction: like Profit.co and Cascade, every metric is created through its own separate form – pick the type, set the values, set a target date for each measure by hand, when it could simply default to the parent goal's timeline. It was annoying enough that I skipped setting the conversion metric up properly.”

    • Goals map to objectives and success measures to key results – each metric built in its own separate form.
    • For a tool inside Jira, connecting work to goals is oddly manual – create the ticket first, then paste its URL.
    • Updates work on the second try – manual status, a note, and a real discussion thread underneath.

    

    

    

    AI in this session: Rovo located the goal and reported its owner, status, target date, and creation date correctly, describing the record's actual state at query time rather than inventing results.

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (4), and lowest on reporting (2).

    Choose it if you want free, lightweight goal visibility inside the Atlassian tools your teams already use, with Rovo able to answer questions about your goals. Skip it if you're serious about OKRs — automated key results, maps, generated reports, reminders, and a setup flow that doesn't fight you.

    Free/user/month · Free tier

    Full review →Visit site ↗

18. 17

    

    Jira Align

    2.4/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Jira Align helps large organizations connect strategy to execution with enterprise planning, portfolio visibility, and OKR-focused strategy management.

    In this category it scores highest on features and task support (3), and lowest on AI features (0).

    Strengths: Enterprise strategy visibility across portfolios and teams · Strategy room with OKR views like heatmaps and trees

    Watch for: Expensive and enterprise-oriented pricing · Complex setup and ongoing administration for smaller teams

    Est. $129/user/month (est.) · Gartner rating 4.4 (92)

    Full review →AlternativesVisit site ↗

19. 17

    

    Leapsome

    2.4/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Leapsome is a people enablement platform that includes goals and OKRs alongside performance, engagement, and learning workflows. It is often used by HR-led teams that want goals connected to broader people programs.

    In this category it scores highest on ease of use and integrations (3), and lowest on pricing transparency (1).

    Strengths: Strong all-in-one people suite with integrated goals · Modern UX and flexible workflows

    Watch for: Not a pure-play OKR product · Pricing is not fully transparent

    Est. $11/user/month (est.) · 14-day trial · G2 rating 4.8 (2,296)

    Full review →Visit site ↗

20. 20

    

    Range

    2.1/5

    Overall benchmark score

    Range is a team coordination tool built around async check-ins, meetings, and mood sharing, with a lightweight goals feature attached. It is not structured around the OKR model.

    Tested hands-on (Sep 2026) · Pro trial (14 days, no credit card)

    “Range makes a great first impression. The UI is genuinely clean – up there with Tability and Mooncamp, the best-designed tools I have tested – and finding the goals section took seconds. Then I tried to enter my OKRs, and the evaluation was effectively over in ten minutes.”

    • Range's goals don't follow the OKR model – no key results, and no metric at creation.
    • Every metric starts at zero – we could not express "from 40 to 60".
    • Updates record a value, a status, and a note – but there's no progress chart and no way to comment on an update.

    

    

    

    In this category it scores highest on pricing transparency (5), and lowest on AI features (0).

    Choose it if you want a clean tool for async team check-ins, mood, and meetings, with lightweight goals attached — and you're not running a real OKR program. Skip it if you need actual OKRs — baselines, key results, progress charts, data connectors, or AI. Range's goal model can't express "from 40 to 60".

    $8/user/month · Free tier

    Full review →Visit site ↗

How to choose in this category

How we compare

Scores in detail

Download the data behind this comparison — versioned JSON/CSV, free to reuse with attribution.

Frequently asked questions