The OKR Software Benchmark · 2026.Q3
Best OKR software with Asana integration in 2026
Sync Asana tasks to OKRs for automatic progress tracking
Updated July 31, 2026 · 7 platforms evaluated · How we rank · Changelog
Connect your Asana tasks and projects to your OKRs. Automatically track progress as your team completes work in Asana and link initiatives to objectives.
The ranking
- 01
Profit.co
Top pick3.9Profit.co is a comprehensive OKR platform that combines objectives and key results with performance management. It offers a wide range of features for enterprise teams.
In this category it scores highest on integration quality and two-way sync (4), and lowest on setup ease (3).
Strengths: Complete integrations · Employee performance management features
Watch for: Expensive to deploy · Min. annual spend of $10,000
Est. $9/user/month (est.) · 30-day trial · G2 4.7 (471) · Gartner 4.7 (109)
- 023.8
Rhythms.ai is an innovative AI-powered platform that helps teams align strategy with execution. It combines OKRs with AI assistance to help teams set better goals, track progress, and drive accountability.
In this category it scores highest on task mapping (4.5), and lowest on setup ease (3).
Strengths: AI-powered goal suggestions and insights · Strong integrations with Microsoft Ecosystem (ex Viva Goals team)
Watch for: Limited flexibility in goal structure · UI can be heavy and confusing for new users
$22/user/month · Free tier
- 033.7
Tability is a modern goal-tracking platform designed for teams who want to manage OKRs without complexity. It focuses on simplicity, accountability, and actionable insights.
In this category it scores highest on task mapping (5), and lowest on two-way sync (3).
Strengths: Simple, intuitive interface · Enterprise-ready with EU, AU, and US hosting options
Watch for: Limited integrations with HRIS systems · No free plan
$6/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 4.7 (161) · Gartner 4.9 (46)
- 043.4
Betterworks is a mature enterprise HR platform focused on performance management and continuous conversations. It's focused on employee engagement but also has OKR functionality.
In this category it scores highest on two-way sync (4), and lowest on task mapping (3).
Strengths: Performance management capabilities · AI-powered insights for HR
Watch for: OKRs is secondary to performance management · Higher pricing (min. 500 users)
$8/user/month · G2 4.4 (217) · Gartner 4.5 (12)
- 05
Mooncamp is a modern, user-friendly OKR platform designed for fast-growing companies. It focuses on simplicity and ease of use while providing powerful OKR management features.
In this category it scores highest on integration quality (4), and lowest on task mapping (1).
Strengths: EU based (GDPR compliant) · Modern, clean interface
Watch for: Only annual plans available · No support for tasks
$8.1/user/month · 14-day trial · G2 4.8 (296) · Gartner 4 (2)
- 062.6
WorkBoard is an enterprise-grade OKR platform designed for large organizations. It offers comprehensive planning, execution, and analytics capabilities.
In this category it scores highest on integration quality and two-way sync (3), and lowest on setup ease (2).
Strengths: Comprehensive enterprise features · Strong analytics
Watch for: Steep learning curve · Expensive solution to deploy
Est. $30/user/month (est.) · G2 4.3 (342) · Gartner 4.2 (89)
- 072.4
Weekdone combines weekly planning with OKR tracking. It's designed for teams that want structured check-ins and progress updates.
In this category it scores highest on setup ease (3), and lowest on two-way sync (2).
Strengths: Simple product · Visual tree for OKRs and goals
Watch for: Limited enterprise features · Basic analytics and reporting
$9/user/month · Free tier · G2 4.1 (38)
How to choose in this category
Asana integration should make goal execution easier, not create duplicate status work. The best platforms connect project delivery activity to measurable outcomes with minimal process friction.
Prioritize mapping quality over connector breadth
A long feature list is less important than accurate linkage between initiatives, tasks, and objective progress.
Strong tools make contribution to outcomes visible across projects and teams.
- Test one objective with tasks from multiple Asana projects.
- Validate how reassigned tasks affect ownership in the OKR layer.
- Confirm update logic reflects meaningful progress, not just activity.
Keep contributors in a single execution flow
Teams adopt faster when they do not need to recreate updates in both tools every week.
Choose software where check-ins and sync behavior reduce context switching for contributors and managers.
Support sustainable operations as usage grows
Integration configurations should remain stable as process detail and team count increase.
Better options reduce maintenance burden for operations leaders over the long term.
Use this ranking to find tools that can tie Asana execution to OKR outcomes reliably, then validate with a live cross-functional initiative before expanding rollout.
How we compare
Our scoring focuses specifically on OKR capabilities. If a platform offers OKRs alongside other features (like performance management or project management), we evaluate how well it handles OKRs specifically, not its full feature set.
Integration Quality
35%Teams need dependable data flow from Asana projects and tasks into objective progress tracking.
This criterion rewards products that minimize sync errors and preserve planning context.
Two-way Sync
30%Two-way behavior matters when teams update status across both planning and execution systems.
Higher scores go to tools where sync direction is predictable and operationally stable.
Task Mapping
20%Mapping should show how work contributes to outcomes, not just mirror task completion volume.
We prioritize products that keep ownership and initiative context clear across systems.
Setup Ease
15%Asana-heavy teams benefit most from integrations they can launch quickly without long implementation cycles.
This criterion favors connectors that are straightforward to configure and maintain over time.
Scores in detail
| Platform | Overall Score | Integration Quality | Two-way Sync | Task Mapping | Setup Ease | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top pickProfit.co | 3.9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | Est. $9/user/month |
Rhythms.ai | 3.8 | 3.5 | 4 | 4.5 | 3 | $22/user/month |
Tability | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3 | 5 | 4 | $6/user/month |
Betterworks | 3.4 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3.5 | $8/user/month |
Mooncamp | 3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | $8.1/user/month |
WorkBoard | 2.6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Est. $30/user/month |
Weekdone | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2 | 2.5 | 3 | $9/user/month |
Download the data behind this comparison — versioned JSON/CSV, free to reuse with attribution.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best OKR software with asana integration?
Profit.co ranks first with asana integration in The OKR Software Benchmark with a score of 3.9/5, ahead of Rhythms.ai (3.8) and Tability (3.7). Scores weight the criteria that matter most for this use case, led by Integration Quality (35%) and Two-way Sync (30%).
How are tools ranked in the Best OKR software with Asana integration comparison?
We weight criteria specific to this use case, with the strongest emphasis on Integration Quality (35%) and Two-way Sync (30%), then calculate an overall score out of 5. The full scoring model and weights are published on our methodology page, and every ranking change is logged in a public changelog.
How many OKR tools with asana integration publish their pricing?
5 of the 7 actively maintained platforms in this comparison publish pricing publicly. The median public starting price is $8.10/user/month. Pricing data is verified against vendor pricing pages and carries a last-verified date.
The bottom line: Profit.co is our pick with asana integration.