Oboard vs Envisio

Oboard is the stronger OKR platform in this comparison — 3.1/5 against 2.4/5 for Envisio on our hands-on benchmark.

A side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, integrations, and ratings · How we rank

Oboard logo
OKR software for Jira
3.1
Overall benchmark score

Oboard is an OKR management platform that integrates directly into Jira and Confluence workflows. It helps teams cascade company objectives and tie them to work items for better alignment.

$2.16/user/month
Free plan + from $2.16/user/monthFree TierEnterpriseNative AI features
Top strengths
  • Deep Jira and Confluence integration at a very low per-user price
  • Check-ins done right — auto-versus-manual status toggle and comments built for discussion
  • Useful default dashboard and per-team performance report out of the box
Envisio logo
Public-sector strategic planning and performance software
2.4
Overall benchmark score

Envisio is strategic planning and performance software built exclusively for government, education, healthcare and nonprofit organisations. It is not an OKR product — its site does not mention OKRs — and it offers no trial, so this profile and its scores are documentation-based, not hands-on.

Pricing not public
Contact for pricingEnterpriseNative AI features
Top strengths
  • Built for public-sector reporting, with public dashboards and design support included
  • Budget data from Questica pulled into plans and reports
  • Unlimited users on both plans
CategoryOboardEnvisio
Overall benchmark score3.1/52.4/5
Starting price$2.16/user/monthPricing not public
Full features priceN/AN/A
Min. spendN/A$20,000
Free TierYesNo
Enterprise PlansYesYes
Native AI featuresYesYes
Public APIYesYes
Documented connections (six assessed)1/61/6

Feature coverage

OKR capabilities

FeatureOboardEnvisio
OKR ManagementYesNot verified
Goal TrackingYesYes
KPIsYesYes
Check-insYesNot verified
Tasks SupportYesNot verified
Team CollaborationYesNot verified

Reporting

FeatureOboardEnvisio
Reports & AnalyticsYesYes
Custom ViewsYesNot verified
TemplatesNoNot verified

Integrations

FeatureOboardEnvisio
IntegrationsNoYes
SlackNot verifiedNot verified
Microsoft TeamsNot verifiedYes
Data ConnectorsNoYes
Public APIYesYes

AI capabilities

FeatureOboardEnvisio
Goal-setting AINot verifiedYes
Goal-tracking AIYesNot verified
In-product conversational assistantNot verifiedNot verified
Vendor-hosted MCP serverYesNot verified

Ratings breakdown

RatingOboardEnvisio
Ease of Use3.52.5
Features31.5
Task Support4.52.5
Integration2.52.5
AI features01
Pricing Transparency41
Reporting3.54
Oboard Highlights
Strengths and considerations based on available data. AI flags reflect the separate AI assessment; platform-level numeric ratings have not been refreshed in that review.
Strengths
  • Deep Jira and Confluence integration at a very low per-user price
  • Check-ins done right — auto-versus-manual status toggle and comments built for discussion
  • Useful default dashboard and per-team performance report out of the box
  • Data-driven reports using JQL
Considerations
  • Limited value outside Jira/Confluence ecosystem
  • No data connectors for key results — manual updates everywhere
  • Metric units are constrained (five-character cap), and compact key result panels
Envisio Highlights
Strengths and considerations based on available data. AI flags reflect the separate AI assessment; platform-level numeric ratings have not been refreshed in that review.
Strengths
  • Built for public-sector reporting, with public dashboards and design support included
  • Budget data from Questica pulled into plans and reports
  • Unlimited users on both plans
  • SSO, training and a customer success manager included in every quote
Considerations
  • No OKRs, confidence ratings or weekly check-ins in anything we could find
  • A form-heavy interface in the style of Microsoft Project or SharePoint
  • Built for reporting upward, with no visible room for team discussion

Key integrations

Oboard has documented connections for Jira among the six connections this benchmark assesses in depth.

Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.

Key integrations

Envisio has documented connections for Microsoft Teams among the six connections this benchmark assesses in depth.

Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.

Frequently asked questions

Which platform has the highest rating?

Oboard has the higher Overall benchmark score (3.1/5 versus 2.4/5).

Which product is the most affordable?

Oboard is the only platform here with comparable public or estimated starting pricing, at $2.16/user/month.

Which integrations and workflows are documented for these platforms?

Oboard: documented connections for Jira. See the integration guides for supported actions, connection methods and restrictions. Envisio: documented connections for Microsoft Teams. See the integration guides for supported actions, connection methods and restrictions.

Tability logo

An alternative to Envisio and Oboard: Tability

Tability is an AI-native OKR platform built around a simple idea: the weekly check-in is the habit that keeps goals alive. Plans import from a paste of text, every key result gets its own page and progress graph, the dashboards leadership will ask for exist before you build anything, and the AI layer – an MCP server, scheduled reports, agents that can own a goal – comes wired in rather than bolted on.

On this benchmark it scores 4.5/5, against Envisio's 2.4 and Oboard's 3.1 – measured with the same recorded 30-minute scenario as every tested platform, with the session evidence published. The widest gaps are on AI features, OKR features and ease of use. To be fair: Oboard scores higher on task support.

Tability also publishes its pricing – plans start at $6/user/month, where Envisio is quote-only.

The OKR software buyer report

Take the benchmark with you

The full market briefing as a PDF — rankings, pricing, AI results, and readiness matrices — plus the complete dataset as a CSV, delivered to your inbox.