Quantive (discontinued) has been acquired
Acquired by WorkBoard. The Quantive product is being consolidated into the WorkBoard platform (May 2025) — WorkBoard stated Quantive customers would migrate to the WorkBoard platform with dedicated support. As of July 2026, quantive.com redirects to workboard.com and the standalone Quantive product is no longer sold. Source
Quantive (discontinued) vs Rhythms.ai
Quantive is the stronger OKR platform in this comparison — 4.0/5 against 3.3/5 for Rhythms.ai on our hands-on benchmark.
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, integrations, and ratings.
Quantive was an enterprise strategy execution and OKR platform focused on alignment and business outcomes. As of May 28, 2025, Quantive was acquired by WorkBoard and the standalone product is being transitioned to the WorkBoard platform over time.
- Strong enterprise OKR and strategy workflows
- Deep analytics and dashboarding for leadership reporting
- Good support for cross-functional alignment and cascading goals
Rhythms.ai is an innovative AI-powered platform that helps teams align strategy with execution. It combines OKRs with AI assistance to help teams set better goals, track progress, and drive accountability.
- Chat-first AI that sets up a full OKR plan from pasted text, verified in our test
- MCP client support and a connector catalog were documented; vendor-hosted server remains unverified
- Check-in cadences and reminders configurable per team, with manual status and expected-vs-actual shown
At a glance
Data behind this comparison| Category | Quantive (discontinued) | Rhythms.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Overall benchmark score | 4.0/5 | 3.3/5 |
| Starting price | Est. $18/user/month | Est. $22/user/month |
| Full features price | Est. $45/user/month | Est. $22/user/month |
| Min. spend | $12,000 | N/A |
| Free Tier | No | Yes |
| Enterprise Plans | Yes | Yes |
| Native AI features | Yes | Yes |
| Public API | Yes | No |
| Documented connections (six assessed) | 0/6 | 4/6 |
Feature coverage
OKR capabilities
| Feature | Quantive (discontinued) | Rhythms.ai |
|---|---|---|
| OKR Management | Yes | Yes |
| Goal Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| KPIs | Yes | No |
| Check-ins | Yes | Yes |
| Tasks Support | No | No |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
Reporting
| Feature | Quantive (discontinued) | Rhythms.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Reports & Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Custom Views | Yes | Yes |
| Templates | Yes | No |
Integrations
| Feature | Quantive (discontinued) | Rhythms.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Yes | Yes |
| Slack | Not verified | Yes |
| Microsoft Teams | Not verified | Not verified |
| Data Connectors | Yes | Yes |
| Public API | Yes | No |
AI capabilities
| Feature | Quantive (discontinued) | Rhythms.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Goal-setting AI | Yes | Yes |
| Goal-tracking AI | Yes | Yes |
| In-product conversational assistant | Yes | Yes |
| Vendor-hosted MCP server | No | Not verified |
Ratings breakdown
| Rating | Quantive (discontinued) | Rhythms.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 3.75 | 3 |
| Features | 4.5 | 3 |
| Task Support | 3 | 3 |
| Integration | 4.5 | 4 |
| AI features | 4 | 4 |
| Pricing Transparency | 1 | 1 |
| Reporting | 4.5 | 4 |
- Strong enterprise OKR and strategy workflows
- Deep analytics and dashboarding for leadership reporting
- Good support for cross-functional alignment and cascading goals
- Broad integration ecosystem
- Pricing is not publicly transparent
- Setup can be complex for smaller teams
- Better fit for mature organizations than early-stage startups
- Chat-first AI that sets up a full OKR plan from pasted text, verified in our test
- MCP client support and a connector catalog were documented; vendor-hosted server remains unverified
- Check-in cadences and reminders configurable per team, with manual status and expected-vs-actual shown
- Readable check-in coverage and compliance reports
- Chat-first navigation can bury the state of your OKRs, and the app can feel slow
- Small key result panels give detailed work a spreadsheet feel
- Only one report type out of the box — richer views are self-assembled
Key integrations
Quantive (discontinued) has no documented connection yet among the six this benchmark assesses in depth.
Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.
Key integrations
Rhythms.ai has documented connections for Slack, Linear, Jira and Asana among the six connections this benchmark assesses in depth.
Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.
Frequently asked questions
Is Quantive still available?
No. Acquired by WorkBoard. The Quantive product is being consolidated into the WorkBoard platform. WorkBoard stated Quantive customers would migrate to the WorkBoard platform with dedicated support. As of July 2026, quantive.com redirects to workboard.com and the standalone Quantive product is no longer sold.
Which platform has the highest rating?
Quantive (discontinued) has the higher Overall benchmark score (4.0/5 versus 3.3/5).
Which product is the most affordable?
Rhythms.ai — Quantive is no longer sold, so Rhythms.ai is the only currently purchasable option in this comparison.
Which integrations and workflows are documented for these platforms?
Quantive (discontinued): documented connections for none of the six assessed platforms yet. See the integration guides for supported actions, connection methods and restrictions. Rhythms.ai: documented connections for Slack, Linear, Jira, Asana. See the integration guides for supported actions, connection methods and restrictions.
An alternative to Quantive (discontinued) and Rhythms.ai: Tability
Tability is an AI-native OKR platform built around a simple idea: the weekly check-in is the habit that keeps goals alive. Plans import from a paste of text, every key result gets its own page and progress graph, the dashboards leadership will ask for exist before you build anything, and the AI layer – an MCP server, scheduled reports, agents that can own a goal – comes wired in rather than bolted on.
On this benchmark it scores 4.5/5, against Quantive (discontinued)'s 4.0 and Rhythms.ai's 3.3 – measured with the same recorded 30-minute scenario as every tested platform, with the session evidence published. The widest gaps are on pricing transparency, ease of use and task support. To be fair: Quantive (discontinued) scores higher on integrations, and Quantive (discontinued) on reporting.
Tability also publishes its pricing – plans start at $6/user/month, where both Quantive (discontinued) and Rhythms.ai are quote-only.