Atlassian Goals vs Range
Atlassian Goals is the stronger OKR platform in this comparison — 2.4/5 against 2.1/5 for Range on our hands-on benchmark.
A side-by-side comparison of pricing, features, integrations, and ratings.
Atlassian Goals is the goals platform app included with every Atlassian cloud plan. It tracks objectives and success measures across Jira and Confluence, aimed at lightweight goal visibility rather than a full OKR practice.
- Included free with every Atlassian cloud plan — no separate purchase
- Lives where Jira and Confluence teams already work
- Good discussions on updates, with Jira's commenting DNA
Range is a team coordination tool built around async check-ins, meetings, and mood sharing, with a lightweight goals feature attached. It is not structured around the OKR model.
- Clean, modern interface — up there with the best-designed tools in this benchmark
- Generous free tier for up to 12 users, with month-to-month billing on Pro
- Built-in team rhythm — async check-ins, mood trends, meetings, kudos
At a glance
Data behind this comparison| Category | Atlassian Goals | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Overall benchmark score | 2.4/5 | 2.1/5 |
| Starting price | Free/user/month | $8/user/month |
| Full features price | N/A | $8/user/month |
| Min. spend | N/A | N/A |
| Free Tier | Yes | Yes |
| Enterprise Plans | Yes | Yes |
| Native AI features | Yes | No |
| Public API | No | No |
| Documented connections (six assessed) | 1/6 | 3/6 |
Feature coverage
OKR capabilities
| Feature | Atlassian Goals | Range |
|---|---|---|
| OKR Management | Yes | No |
| Goal Tracking | Yes | Yes |
| KPIs | No | No |
| Check-ins | Yes | Yes |
| Tasks Support | Yes | Not verified |
| Team Collaboration | Yes | Yes |
Reporting
| Feature | Atlassian Goals | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Reports & Analytics | No | Yes |
| Custom Views | No | Not verified |
| Templates | No | Not verified |
Integrations
| Feature | Atlassian Goals | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Integrations | Yes | Yes |
| Slack | Not verified | Yes |
| Microsoft Teams | Not verified | Yes |
| Data Connectors | No | No |
| Public API | Not verified | Not verified |
AI capabilities
| Feature | Atlassian Goals | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Goal-setting AI | No | No |
| Goal-tracking AI | No | No |
| In-product conversational assistant | Yes | No |
| Vendor-hosted MCP server | Yes | Not verified |
Ratings breakdown
| Rating | Atlassian Goals | Range |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 2.5 | 3.5 |
| Features | 2 | 1.5 |
| Task Support | 3 | 2 |
| Integration | 2.5 | 2 |
| AI features | 3 | 0 |
| Pricing Transparency | 4 | 5 |
| Reporting | 2 | 2 |
- Included free with every Atlassian cloud plan — no separate purchase
- Lives where Jira and Confluence teams already work
- Good discussions on updates, with Jira's commenting DNA
- Rovo found our goal correctly in the hands-on test, and a Rovo MCP server exists
- Every success measure is built through its own separate form, with target dates set by hand
- Linking work means creating the Jira ticket first and pasting its URL — you can't create work from a goal
- No cascading or strategy maps, no generated reports, and thin cards for managers to read
- Clean, modern interface — up there with the best-designed tools in this benchmark
- Generous free tier for up to 12 users, with month-to-month billing on Pro
- Built-in team rhythm — async check-ins, mood trends, meetings, kudos
- 75+ integrations that attach work items from other tools to check-ins
- Goals don't follow the OKR model — no key results, and no metric at goal creation
- Metrics start at zero with no way to set a baseline, so "from 40 to 60" can't be expressed
- Setting a metric happens through sharing a status update, which is counterintuitive
Key integrations
Atlassian Goals has documented connections for Jira among the six connections this benchmark assesses in depth.
Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.
Key integrations
Range has documented connections for Slack, Jira and Microsoft Teams among the six connections this benchmark assesses in depth.
Each guide covers supported actions, setup, and plan requirements. Find vendors for your full stack.
Frequently asked questions
Which platform has the highest rating?
Atlassian Goals has the higher Overall benchmark score (2.4/5 versus 2.1/5).
Which product is the most affordable?
Atlassian Goals is currently the more affordable option based on starting price (Free/user/month).
Which integrations and workflows are documented for these platforms?
Atlassian Goals: documented connections for Jira. See the integration guides for supported actions, connection methods and restrictions. Range: documented connections for Slack, Jira, Microsoft Teams. See the integration guides for supported actions, connection methods and restrictions.
Consider Tability as a modern alternative
If you want a simpler, faster-to-deploy OKR platform with strong AI support and transparent pricing, Tability is a compelling option.
- Simple, intuitive interface
- Enterprise-ready with EU, AU, and US hosting options
- OKR agent with AI-powered insights and check-ins