Product strategy example

Product strategy example for a field service software company

A SaaS product strategy states which subscribers the product is built for, how it gets them to value quickly enough to renew and expand, and where the product will not go. It is owned by the chief product officer and agreed with the chief executive, engineering, customer success and sales.

This is the SaaS version of the product strategy template.

Horizon: 2 years4 priorities · 10 outcomes
Use this template Free download

Get the Word file

Enter your work email and the Word version downloads straight away.

We'll email you occasional Tability updates. Unsubscribe at any time.

What this product strategy template includes

  • ContextThe situation, the challenges to solve, and what is deliberately left out.
  • Product visionThe future the product is working toward.
  • Target customer and problemWho the product serves and the job they need done.
  • Positioning and differentiationWhy this product and not another.
  • Strategic betsThe few areas of investment and what each is expected to prove.
  • Product principlesThe rules that guide trade-offs.
  • Priorities and measuresThree to five priorities, each with an owner, outcomes with a baseline and target, and the initiatives behind them.

Worked example

A complete product strategy for a fictional organization: field service management software company selling subscriptions to residential heating, plumbing and electrical contractors.

Worked exampleProduct strategy
OrganizationField service management software company selling subscriptions to residential heating, plumbing and electrical contractors (500 staff)
AmbitionBe the field service product a contractor with 5 to 49 technicians can set up in two weeks and that technicians choose to use, taking net revenue retention from 97% to 104%.
Horizon2 years

Context

Where we are and what we are choosing

The product has 11,200 customers and $84M in ARR. Contractors with 5 to 49 technicians are 6,500 of those customers and 72% of ARR. Gross revenue retention is 86% and net revenue retention 97%, so growth depends on replacing what leaves. First-year logo retention is 76%. The median new customer dispatches a first job 47 days after signing, after about 18 hours of calls and data cleanup with one of 35 onboarding specialists. Only 54% of technician seats are active in a given week. Last year 34% of engineering capacity went to requests from the 400 customers with 50 or more technicians, who hold 13% of ARR.

Challenges
  • Setup is too slow for a busy contractor. Customers who dispatch a job within 14 days of signing retain at 91% in year one, those who take more than 45 days retain at 68%, and the median is 47 days.
  • Technicians avoid the mobile app, so office staff re-enter job notes and invoices. Accounts with under 40% of technician seats active renew at 71%, against 95% for accounts above 80%.
  • The roadmap follows the loudest accounts. A third of the capacity of 120 engineers serves 400 large customers with multi-branch and custom reporting requests that the core segment never uses.
We will focus on
  • Owner-operated residential heating, plumbing and electrical contractors with 5 to 49 technicians.
  • The first 30 days and the technician's working day, the two places where renewals are decided.
  • One expansion path inside the core segment: service agreements managed in the product.
We will not
  • Multi-branch, commercial and construction-style job costing features. The 400 largest customers will get an export API and fewer new features, and we expect some of them to leave.
  • A homeowner marketplace that sends leads to contractors. The revenue is tempting, but it would rank our customers against each other and make us a competitor to their own marketing.
  • New trades such as landscaping, cleaning or pest control until first-year retention in the three core trades is above 85%.

Product vision

VisionA contractor signs on Monday and runs Friday's jobs from the product. Every technician finishes the job, the invoice and the next visit on a phone in the customer's driveway, and the office never types anything twice.
Time frameThree years for the full vision. This strategy covers 24 months, to the end of Q4 2028, with a checkpoint at the end of 2027 on time to first dispatched job and technician activity.

Target customer and problem

Target customerThe owner or operations manager of a residential heating, plumbing or electrical contractor with 5 to 49 technicians, one or two dispatchers and an office manager who also handles billing. There is no IT staff.
ProblemThe owner bought software to stop losing jobs and invoices between the phone, the whiteboard and the truck. Setup competes with the busy season, the pricebook and customer list arrive half-imported, and technicians keep writing paper tickets. Three months in, the office is running two systems.
Current alternativeA whiteboard or shared calendar for dispatch, paper or carbonless invoices in the truck and accounting software for billing. Some switch from a cheaper scheduling app that has no pricebook or service agreements.
Why nowOur own numbers leave no choice. With gross retention at 86%, about $12M of ARR has to be replaced each year before the company grows, and a pilot of 120 accounts using a guided import went live in a median of 19 days.

Positioning and differentiation

We are the onlyField service software that an owner-operated home service contractor with 5 to 49 technicians can set up without a consultant, and that technicians use without being told to.
DifferentiatorsA guided setup that imports the customer list, pricebook and open jobs from the accounting system and prior tools. A technician app that works without signal and closes a job in under two minutes. Service agreements, renewals and recurring visits built into scheduling, not bolted on.
Where we will not competeContractors with 50 or more technicians that need multi-branch controls and custom reporting. Commercial and construction contractors with project-based job costing. One-truck operators choosing on price, who stay on the self-serve plan with no dedicated investment.

Strategic bets

BetHypothesisEvidence so farInvestment
Live in 14 daysCutting median time to first dispatched job from 47 days to 14 lifts first-year logo retention from 76% to 86%Year-one retention is 91% for accounts dispatching within 14 days and 68% beyond 45 days; guided import pilot went live in a median of 19 days22 engineers, 3 product managers, 4 designers
A technician app that replaces paperRaising weekly active technician seats from 54% to 80% lifts gross revenue retention to 90%Renewal is 95% above 80% seat activity and 71% below 40%; mobile sync causes 38% of support tickets28 engineers, 2 product managers, 3 designers
Service agreements as the expansion pathCore customers who run service agreements in the product add seats and modules, and grow with usThe 18% of core customers using the module have net retention of 108% against 94% for the rest, and pay $1,800 a year more16 engineers, 2 product managers
Export API in place of custom workA documented data export and reporting API settles most large-customer report requests without roadmap time310 of 520 open requests from large customers are variations on a report10 engineers for 12 months, then 4

Product principles

  • If a new customer needs a call to finish a setup step, the step is broken. Onboarding specialists handle exceptions, not the standard path.
  • The technician is the user we design for first. A feature that adds a tap in the field has to remove a task in the office.
  • The app works in a basement with no signal. Anything that fails offline does not ship to mobile.
  • We build for the contractor with 5 to 49 technicians. A request that only a 50-technician account would use goes to the API, not the roadmap.
  • Defaults over settings. Every new option ships switched to what most core customers need, with trade-specific templates for the rest.
  • We charge more only when the contractor earns more. Add-ons are priced against revenue they help create, such as agreement renewals.

Priorities and measures

Priority 1Owner: Director of Product, Activation

Get new contractors dispatching in two weeks

The gap in first-year retention between fast and slow starters is 23 points, and the median customer is a slow starter. Nothing else in the product is worth as much revenue.

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
Median time from contract to first dispatched jobMilestones: 25 days by Q4 202747 days14 daysQ4 2028
New customers that dispatch a job within 30 daysMilestones: 62% by Q4 202741%80%Q4 2028
First-year logo retentionMilestones: 80% by Q4 202776%86%Q4 2028
Initiatives
  • Take the guided import of customers, pricebook and open jobs from the 120-account pilot to every new customer
  • Ship starter pricebooks and job templates for each of the three core trades
  • Replace the 18 hours of onboarding calls and data cleanup with an in-product checklist and one optional review call
  • Show customer success a daily list of new accounts that have not dispatched a job by day 10
Targets are illustrative. Adapt them to your baseline before you start.
Priority 2Owner: Director of Product, Mobile

Make the app the technician's default

Renewal follows technician activity more closely than any other signal we track, and 46% of technician seats are idle in a given week. The app has to be faster than paper where technicians work.

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
Technician seats active each weekMilestones: 68% by Q4 202754%80%Q4 2028
Jobs closed and invoiced from the fieldMilestones: 55% by Q4 202737%70%Q4 2028
Gross revenue retentionMilestones: 88% by Q4 202786%90%Q4 2028
Initiatives
  • Rebuild mobile sync so jobs, photos and invoices save offline and upload without duplicates
  • Cut job close-out to one screen: work done, parts used, payment and signature
  • Let technicians quote and book follow-up work on site from the pricebook
  • Ride along with technicians at 20 customers each quarter and publish what slowed them down
Targets are illustrative. Adapt them to your baseline before you start.
Priority 3Owner: Group Product Manager, Revenue Products

Grow accounts through service agreements

Customers who manage service agreements in the product retain 14 points better on net revenue and pay $1,800 a year more, but only 18% of the core segment uses the module. It is the one expansion path that also makes the contractor money.

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
Core-segment customers managing service agreements in the productMilestones: 28% by Q4 202718%40%Q4 2028
Net revenue retentionMilestones: 100% by Q4 202797%104%Q4 2028
Initiatives
  • Generate recurring visits and renewal reminders automatically from each agreement
  • Let technicians sell an agreement at job close-out with pricing shown against the repair just done
  • Add a 60-day trial of the module, started from the scheduling screen
  • Report agreement revenue and renewal rate to the owner each month
Targets are illustrative. Adapt them to your baseline before you start.
Priority 4Owner: VP of Engineering

Take large-account custom work off the roadmap

The three bets above need 66 engineers, and a third of capacity is committed to 400 accounts outside the target segment. That capacity has to be released before anything else can be staffed.

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
Engineering capacity spent on requests from customers with 50 or more techniciansMilestones: 18% by Q4 202734%10%Q2 2028
Open custom report requests from large customersMilestones: 150 requests by Q4 2027310 requests60 requestsQ4 2028
Initiatives
  • Release a documented export and reporting API with ten prebuilt report templates
  • Close the custom request queue and tell each large customer which requests the API covers
  • Stop new sales to contractors above 75 technicians and brief account managers on the change
  • Certify three reporting partners to build custom dashboards for large accounts
Targets are illustrative. Adapt them to your baseline before you start.

Blank product strategy template

The same structure with a prompt in every field. Copy it, or download it as a Word or Excel file.

Your planProduct strategy
Organization[Describe your organization in a few words, with its size]
Ambition[One sentence on where you want to be at the end of the plan]
Horizon[How long the plan runs, for example 12 months]

Context

Where we are and what we are choosing

[Where things stand today: the facts that make this strategy necessary]

Challenges
  • [A problem the strategy has to solve]
  • [A problem the strategy has to solve]
We will focus on
  • [Something you are choosing to concentrate on]
  • [Something you are choosing to concentrate on]
We will not
  • [Something you are deliberately leaving out]
  • [Something you are deliberately leaving out]

Product vision

Vision[Your vision]
Time frame[Your time frame]

Target customer and problem

Target customer[Your target customer]
Problem[Your problem]
Current alternative[Your current alternative]
Why now[Your why now]

Positioning and differentiation

We are the only[Your we are the only]
Differentiators[Your differentiators]
Where we will not compete[Your where we will not compete]

Strategic bets

BetHypothesisEvidence so farInvestment
[Bet][Hypothesis][Evidence so far][Investment]
[Bet][Hypothesis][Evidence so far][Investment]
[Bet][Hypothesis][Evidence so far][Investment]

Product principles

  • [A principle that settles a recurring trade-off]
  • [A principle that settles a recurring trade-off]
  • [A principle that settles a recurring trade-off]

Priorities and measures

Priority 1Owner: [Role accountable for this priority]

[Name the priority in a few words]

[Why this priority matters now, in one or two sentences]

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
Initiatives
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
Priority 2Owner: [Role accountable for this priority]

[Name the priority in a few words]

[Why this priority matters now, in one or two sentences]

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
Initiatives
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
Priority 3Owner: [Role accountable for this priority]

[Name the priority in a few words]

[Why this priority matters now, in one or two sentences]

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
Initiatives
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
Priority 4Owner: [Role accountable for this priority]

[Name the priority in a few words]

[Why this priority matters now, in one or two sentences]

OutcomeBaselineTargetDue
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
[Metric you will track][Where it is today][Where it should be][When]
Initiatives
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
  • [A project or action that moves the outcomes above]
Free download

Get the Word file

Enter your work email and the Word version downloads straight away.

We'll email you occasional Tability updates. Unsubscribe at any time.

How to adapt it

  1. 01

    Break ARR, gross retention and net retention out by customer segment and by first-year versus later cohorts. A SaaS product strategy should start from where revenue leaks, not from the feature backlog.

  2. 02

    Find the usage behavior that best predicts renewal in your own data, such as time to first value or weekly active seats, and make it a headline outcome.

  3. 03

    Measure where engineering capacity went last year by customer segment. If a small group of accounts takes a large share, decide openly whether to keep serving them.

  4. 04

    Pick one expansion path that makes the customer more successful, and resist adding paid modules that only raise the bill.

  5. 05

    Add up the people in the investment column and check the total against the engineering team, leaving capacity for reliability and upkeep.

  6. 06

    For a plan of two years or more, set a milestone for each outcome at the halfway point so a bet that is not working is caught early.

How to run it

A plan only works if it is reviewed on a rhythm. This is the cadence the example assumes.

Check-inOutcome owners update progress and confidence weekly.
ReviewPriority owners review outcomes and unblock initiatives monthly.
ResetLeadership revisits priorities and targets quarterly.

Tability keeps this cadence for you. Each priority becomes an objective, each outcome a key result with its baseline and target, and each initiative a tracked task. Owners get a check-in reminder and the plan shows what is on track.

Track this plan in Tability

Still comparing tools? See the 10 best strategy software tools.

Common mistakes

  • Letting the largest accounts set the roadmap because their requests arrive through sales and executives, while the core segment churns quietly.
  • Treating onboarding as a services problem and adding specialists, when the product itself takes too long to set up.
  • Measuring adoption by accounts or licenses sold, which hides seats nobody uses until the renewal conversation.
  • Adding modules to lift net revenue retention before fixing gross retention, so expansion revenue leaves with the churned accounts.

Questions, answered.

What makes a SaaS product strategy different from other product strategies?

A SaaS product earns its revenue over years of renewals, so the strategy has to address retention and expansion as well as winning new customers. That puts time to first value, ongoing usage and the reasons customers leave at the center. A strategy built only around new features for new buyers leaves most of the revenue base unaddressed.

What metrics should a SaaS product strategy use?

Use a small set that links product behavior to recurring revenue: time to first value, active usage among the people who do the daily work, gross revenue retention and net revenue retention. Add one measure per strategic bet. In this example the headline measures are days to first dispatched job, weekly active technician seats and first-year logo retention.

How do you choose a target segment when the product already serves several?

Compare segments on share of ARR, retention and the engineering capacity each consumes. The target is usually where revenue is concentrated and retention can still improve with product work. Here, contractors with 5 to 49 technicians hold 72% of ARR, while the largest accounts hold 13% and take 34% of engineering capacity.

Should a SaaS company build features for its largest customers?

Only if those customers are the target segment. Large accounts ask for controls, reporting and integrations that smaller customers rarely use, and each request looks reasonable on its own. This example gives large customers an export API and partner support in place of roadmap time, and accepts that some will leave.

How long should a SaaS product strategy cover?

One to three years, depending on how long the bets take to show up in retention. Retention outcomes lag product changes by at least one renewal cycle, so a plan built around them needs more than a year. This example runs 24 months with a milestone for every outcome at the end of the first year.