Fees sold have been flat at $128M for two years across four practices and 240 active clients. The firm submitted 610 proposals this year and won 27%. The 260 competitive tenders won at 14% and cost about 90 partner and principal hours each. The 350 proposals to executives we already knew won at 37%. Nine of 38 partners originate 62% of fees. Consultant utilization is 68% against a 75% budget, because work arrives in lumps and in the wrong practices, and realization is 86% of standard rates. Only 22% of clients buy from more than one practice.
Challenges- Partners answer almost every tender that arrives. Lost proposals consumed about 29,000 senior hours this year, most of them on bids where nobody had met the buyer before the document was issued.
- Origination rests on nine partners, six of them within eight years of retirement. The other 29 average $1.7M a year and mostly wait for follow-on work.
- Each practice sells to its own contacts. A client that buys a planning project rarely hears about procurement or plant operations, so the bench in one practice sits idle while another turns work away.
We will focus on- Sixty key clients with $1.5M or more of annual fee potential, each with an account plan and a second-practice partner.
- Pursuits where a partner has spoken with the executive sponsor before any proposal is written.
- Selling work the current bench can start within three weeks.
We will not- Responding to tenders where we had no conversation with the sponsor before issue, including those from well-known companies. We expect to submit about 150 fewer proposals.
- Hiring business development executives to sell for the partners. Selling stays with partners and principals, which is slower to build but is what clients here buy from.
- Discounting below 80% of standard rates to fill the bench, or opening a new practice or office in 2027.